When businesses and the communities they are in work together there are innumerable
benefits for both. There is an
opportunity for sales growth, a healthier population, safer children, and happier
employees just to name a few. Corporate
social responsibility and its various models are formal institutionalized ways
to accomplish these goals. It is a great
concept with poor legislative possibilities.
By that I mean that it would be difficult to create legislation forcing
companies to engage in certain practices deemed socially responsible. The only exception being environmental and
health regulations, it would be a legislative nightmare – at least in the
United States – for the government to have such an invasive role in private
businesses.
The most pressure and call for change is coming from the consumers. The initial challenge was to do something and
give back to the community by being socially responsible. Corporations that are already engaging in
corporate social responsibility are now being challenged to truly transform. The changes must be long term commitments to
which the corporations are sincerely dedicated.
Caroline McCarthy’s commentary about the way some companies front social
responsibility by flimsy green initiatives but still hold to practices and
processes that negatively impact the community and/environment is where the
consumer conversation is headed. People
are noticing that in many cases the commitment to socially responsible behavior
is not genuine. In the age of rapid
communication and transparency, the sheep’s clothing is being ripped off of the
wolf so to speak. Corporate
contradictions are being noticed by the consumers.
I am not sure exactly where or how BP’s corporate social responsibility strategy
failed. What is clear, however, is that
there was a false sense of security.
They were under the guise that by making commitments and creating a
green image, a change had been made when there was not much substance behind
it. From what I read there was not an
in-depth strategic plan in place, or in the very least, not one that anyone in
the corporation was fully committed to executing. The reality that accidents happen should
prepare us for the inevitable. The BP
case shows us that when something does happen, corporations will be put to the
test and their true colors will show especially when taking responsibility
comes down to them parting from resources and money. There is nothing wrong with a company holding
back from being socially responsible as long as they do not pretend to be
so. Eventually it will be put to the
test and I would prefer to know that a company was honestly out for profit and
not the people, than walk around thinking that they care about my community
when they really do not. Let's practice honesty, then we can tackle responsibility.
I agree that in today's age information travels too quickly and is too abundant for companies to be anything but open and honest. BP's CSR plan failed because when the moment of truth came, all the claims they've been making proved to be unsubstantiated. The disaster highlighted a major deficiency and exposed unethical behavior. It shows that companies must act on matters of substance, because when push comes to shove and the oil starts flowing, no one cares about your research initiatives. Great post.
ReplyDeleteAs consumers, as media professionals, as humans, we have so much information at our fingertips - more than ever before. We can make informed decisions, we can search for the exact information we are looking for. We can learn ethics together across the world! Companies need to be aware of this fact and understand that honesty and transparency is the best policy. I love this analogy you used: "the sheep’s clothing is being ripped off of the wolf so to speak. Corporate contradictions are being noticed by the consumers." Perhaps BP did not take this into account when engaging in crisis communications after the oil spill. Thanks for your insights.
ReplyDelete